Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Project
Explanatory Essay
Zotero Library
Project Notes
The MH Project
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Technology
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
<div style="display:grid; grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr 1fr; gap:40px; align-items:start;"> <!-- HEADER ROW (ALL THREE COLUMNS) --> <div><h2>Initial Interpretation</h2></div> <div><h2>Source Material</h2></div> <div><h2>Secondary Interpretations</h2></div> <!-- COLUMN 1 CONTENT --> <div> <p>Why the need to question concerning [my emphasis] technology? It is notable that Heidegger does not question technology directly. That is, he is not criticizing technology by pointing out its detractions, at least not to begin with, and not so overtly. Rather, he says, “Questioning builds a way.” Thus, one might have in mind the figure of a bridge or road traversing two points, a place of departure and one of arrival. Where will we arrive? (And who is this “we” who builds and traverses the way? Has Heidegger not already blazed this path?) No matter, because with the first question we are already on the way, each “answer” a step further.</p> <p>Heizer’s works often take the form of a line of one kind or another. The line is the basis of drawing. Drawing delineates objects, setting them apart from the rest of the world, creating a distinction between object and not-object, between art and not-art. According to legend, Giotto won a commission by drawing a perfect circle without the use of tools, thus demonstrating mastery of his body. More than 600 years later, in the wake of scientific revolution, Heizer drew enormous circles on the dry bed of Jean Lake in Nevada with a motorcycle, thus demonstrating mastery of the Earth. He called this drawing Circular Surface Planar Displacement, a name redolent of the clinic or laboratory, its dispassion itself a displacement disguising the brutality of the artist’s gesture.</p> <p>Many of Heizer’s lines are in fact cuts. As such, they eschew abstract ideas, their geometrical rigor notwithstanding. They are more or less violent interventions in the physical environment. Double Negative is a cut, a line, a subterranean path paradoxically floating above sea level, having been gouged out of Virgin River Mesa, also known as Mormon Mesa, some ninety minutes outside of Las Vegas. A path off the beaten path, beginning and ending in a landscape uninhabited by human beings, connecting nothing. A Holzweg, it would seem, though one not trodden by feet, but rather blasted out of the rock by explosives and “sculpted” by heavy machinery of the type used to build roads, which are another kind of line. It was a new kind of artistic practice, leveraging, with modern technological tools, his power as an individual creator, as homo faber, a practice that Heizer would continue with City.</p> <p>Heizer has never been shy about his reliance on tools, or about the unromantic, industrial nature of his practice. At times, he seems to take pride in its gritty materiality, as one might expect from a civil engineer. Indeed, he has in several cases foregrounded the “toolness” of his work, if indirectly. Pieces such as Biface Perforator #3 resemble ancient stone tools, but only superficially, their size and scale rendering them as useless as Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen’s monumental reproductions of everyday objects, perversions of Heidegger’s concept of Zuhandenheit, or the ready-to-hand.</p> </p>Heizer’s relationship with modern tools and technology has also been problematic on occasion, specifically regarding what is arguably the most powerful tool ever developed by human beings, if it can be called a tool at all. Wind farms, hydroelectric dams, and geothermal plants all harness elemental forces, but none have the destructive potential of nuclear fission. Faced with the prospect of a railway being built near City for the purpose of moving nuclear waste to a planned depository at Yucca Mountain, Heizer threatened destroy his decades-long project, partly out of safety concerns, and partly out of aesthetic ones; the proposed “Caliente Corridor” rail line would, he feared, create noise pollution in addition to the radioactive kind. His threat evidently had the desired effect when in 2015, after a lobbying campaign by Nevada Senator Harry Reid and others, President Barack Obama created the Basin and Range National Monument, granting protection to the region in which City is located and helping to preserve the pristine experience that was Heizer’s aim as a result.</p> <p>There are other connections between Heizer’s work and Nevada’s long involvement with nuclear technologies. Together with the cratered landscape of the Nevada Test Site, created by years underground nuclear weapons testing, Heizer’s Munich Depression (1969) forms a dialectical image. In both cases, the goal is, to appropriate a phrase, civilizational erasure: one permanent, one temporary. As for many of Heizer’s early earthworks, such as the above-mentioned Circular Surface Planar Displacement and to some degree Double Negative, the only traces of Munich Depression in its intended form still in its existence are photographs. Therefore, one has to imagine descending into a manmade crater 30 meters wide and 5 meters deep (dimensions whose ratios appear in other Heizer works) while watching the buildings on the outskirts of the city gradually disappear from view, an experience similar to that of descending into Double Negative, though in that case the suburban apartment buildings are replaced by the surrounding mountains. Those with a certain cast of mind might claim that the combination of, on one hand, an ersatz bomb crater located just outside a city central to the history of the Nazi movement and, on the other, the experience of having one’s brain washed, in a sense, by Heizer’s controlled perceptual environment provocatively evokes the specter of fascism. Though a compelling interpretation this may be, it is worth mentioning that the aim of James Turrell’s own decades long project Roden Crater (1977-) is also a kind of controlled sensory experience. As already mentioned, photographic technology has been vital for the preservation of Heizer’s oeuvre, if not for his practice. For example, life size prints of photographs taken from inside Munich Depression were later used in the installation Actual Size: Munich Rotary (1970), a recreation exhibited at LACMA and the Whitney Museum of American Art, far removed from the original work’s physical and environmental context, an unusual distillation of his materialist idiom. Beyond preservation, photography has also been crucial for bringing remote, large-scale earthworks into public consciousness. The photographs of Gianfranco Gorgoni, who documented the work of Heizer and other fellow travelers such as Robert Smithson and Walter De Maria, are so iconic that in the minds of many, perhaps, they are the work…</p> </div> <!-- COLUMN 2 + 3 CONTENT --> <div style="grid-column:2 / span 2; display:grid; grid-template-columns:1fr 1fr; gap:30px;"> <div><p><b>In what follows we shall be questioning concerning technology. Questioning builds a way. </b><br>—Martin Heidegger, "The Question Concerning Technology"</br></p></div> <div>Questioning is not an inquiry about technology as an object, but an entry into a path along which technology reveals itself as a mode of understanding and structuring the world.</div> <div>[[File:Circular.png|thumb|upright=0.9|link=https://www.getty.edu/art/collection/object/108GTS|Michael Heizer, <i>Circular Surface Planar Displacement</i>, 1970–72]]</div> <div>The work displaces drawing into action: the circle is no longer represented but enacted, transforming the ground into a site of technological inscription.</div> <div>[[File:Gutai.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://monoskop.org/Gutai_Art_Association|Saburō Murakami, <i>Sakuhin (Tsuka) [Passage]</i>, 1956.]]</div> <div>The act of breaking through material anticipates later technological interventions, where the boundary between body, tool, and surface collapses.</div> <div>[[File:Dwight.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://www.army.mil/article/198095/dwight_d_eisenhower_and_the_birth_of_the_interstate_highway_system|Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways]]</div> <div>The highway system operates as a continental-scale line, organizing space, movement, and perception through technological planning.</div> <div> <p><b>When I was teaching at the Cooper Union in the first year or two of the fifties, someone told me how I could get onto the unfinished New Jersey Turnpike. I took three student and drove from somewhere in the Meadows to New Brunswick. It was a dark night and there were no lights or shoulder markers, lines, railings, or anything at all except the dark pavement moving through the landscape of the flats, rimmed by hills in the distance, but punctuated by stacks, towers, fumes, and colored lights. This drive was a revealing experience. The road and much of the landscape was artificial, and yet it couldn’t be called a work of art. On the other hand, it did something for me that art had never done. At first, I didn’t know what it was, but its effect was to liberate me from many of the views I had had about art. It seemed that there had been a reality there that had not had any expression in art.</b></p> <p><b>I view art as something vast. I think highway systems fall down because they are not art.</b><br>—Tony Smith in conversation with Samuel Wagstaff</br></p></div> <div>The experience reveals a reality produced by infrastructure that escapes traditional aesthetic categories, suggesting that technology generates its own mode of perception.</div> <div><p><b>I wanted to make an American art which was trans-national.</b><br>—Michael Heizer, <i>Sculpture in Reverse</i></br></p></div> <div>Heizer’s ambition shifts art beyond localized objecthood toward a scale enabled by technology, where territory itself becomes the medium.</div> <div> <p><b>The manufacture and utilization of equipment, tools, and machines, the manufactured and used things themselves, and the needs and ends that they serve, all belong to what technology is. The complex of these contrivances is technology. Technology itself is a contrivance—in Latin, an <i>instrumentum</i>.</p><p>The current conception of technology, according to which it is a means and a human activity, can therefore be called the instrumental and anthropological definition of technology.</b><br>—Martin Heidegger, "The Question Concerning Technology"</br></p> </div> <div>Technology appears not as individual tools but as an interconnected system that orders materials, purposes, and human activity.</div> <div> <p><b>Sculpture, paintings, and drawings using the materials of the earth, are to my mind, a proposal and a projection about a period that may exist on this planet when synthetic and amalgamated industrial products will be unobtainable because of social dysfunction. This approach is a common practice in societies that have not developed technologically.</b><br>—Michael Heizer, <i>Sculpture in Reverse</i></br></p> </div> <div>The turn to raw earth materials anticipates a world in which industrial synthesis is no longer available, reconfiguring technology in relation to scarcity.</div> <div> <p><b>Well, you might say I’m in the construction business. To begin with, I have a tremendous real-estate file on every available piece of property in six Western states. I look for climate and material in the ground. When I find the right spot, I buy it. I chose where to work in Nevada after a three-year survey, which cost some 30 or 40 thousand dollars. But I wasn’t just buying real estate. I was buying gravel, clay, rock, water drainage.</b><br>—Michael Heizer in conversation with John Gruen</br></p> </div> <div>Art becomes a form of construction and extraction, aligning the artist with the logic of engineering and resource management.</div> <div> [[File:Biface.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9 link=http://viewingroom.paulacoopergallery.com/viewing-room/michael-heizer|Michael Heizer, <i>Biface Perforator #3</i>, 1988-89]] </div> <div>The work resembles a tool but cannot be used, exposing the condition of toolness by removing its function.</div> <div> [[File:Shuttlecocks.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-07-23/a-pop-art-giant-claes-oldenburg-mastered-the-urban-spectacle|Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen, <i>Shuttlecocks</i>, 1994]] </div> <div>By enlarging everyday objects beyond usability, the work destabilizes the boundary between function and representation.</div> <div> <p><b>A piece of equipment, a pair of shoes for instance, when finished, is also self-contained like the mere thing, but it does not have the character of having taken shape by itself like the granite boulder. On the other hand, equipment displays an affinity with the artwork insofar as it is something produced by the human hand. However, by its self-sufficient presencing the work of art is similar rather to the mere thing which has taken shape by itself and is self-contained. Nevertheless we do not count such works among mere things. As a rule it is the use-objects around us that are the nearest and the proper things. Thus the piece of equipment is half thing, because characterized by thingliness, and it is something more; at the same it time it is half artwork and yet something less, because lacking the self-sufficiency of the artwork. Equipment has a peculiar position intermediate between thing and work, assuming that such a calculated ordering of them is possible.</b><br>—Martin Heidegger, "The Origin of the Work of Art"</br></p> </div> <div>The distinction between equipment and artwork becomes unstable, revealing objects as suspended between use and contemplation.</div> <div> [[File:Caliente.jpg|frameless|upright=0.9|link=https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/rail-proposal-opposed/]] </div> <div>The intrusion of infrastructure threatens to alter both the physical and perceptual integrity of the site.</div> <div> [https://www.collegeart.org/pdf/caa-news-print-archive/caa-news-07-05.pdf Michael Heizer’s City Threatened by Rail Line] </div> <div>The project becomes entangled in technological and political systems that extend beyond the artwork itself.</div> <div> [https://https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2014/11/03/move-to-protect-heizers-city-from-development Move to protect Heizer’s City from development] </div> <div>Efforts to protect the site reveal how technological development and preservation are in tension.</div> <div> [[File:Munich.png|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://www.lenbachhaus.de/en/digital/collection-online/detail/munich-depression-final-stage-30013148|Michael Heizer, <i>Munich Depression (Final Stage)</i>, 1969]] </div> <div>The artificial crater evokes technological destruction while simultaneously structuring perception through controlled spatial experience.</div> <div> [[File:Craters.png|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/cold-war-craters|Cold War Craters: Earth Resources Research and Science (EROS) Center, USGS]] </div> <div>Military technologies leave lasting inscriptions on the landscape, transforming it into a record of technological force.</div> <div> [[File:Data.png|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://wpintelligence.washingtonpost.com/topics/ai-tech/2025/09/11/visualized-how-ai-data-centers-are-redrawing-global-power-map/?pwapi_token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJyZWFzb24iOiJ3cGktZm9ybSIsIm5iZiI6MTc3Mzk3MDc3NywiaXNzIjoiZW50ZXJwcmlzZS1wb3J0YWwiLCJleHAiOjE3NzQ1NzU1NzcsImlhdCI6MTc3Mzk3MDc3NywidXJsIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly93cGludGVsbGlnZW5jZS53YXNoaW5ndG9ucG9zdC5jb20vdG9waWNzL2FpLXRlY2gvMjAyNS8wOS8xMS92aXN1YWxpemVkLWhvdy1haS1kYXRhLWNlbnRlcnMtYXJlLXJlZHJhd2luZy1nbG9iYWwtcG93ZXItbWFwLyJ9.144c1tAldjNKcV9u4FTOy4FxvHBCU-tjqN8M4hDQ7Jc|Visualized: How AI and data centers are redrawing the global power map]] </div> <div>Contemporary technological systems operate at a global scale while remaining largely invisible, reorganizing power and information.</div> <div> [[File:Gorgoni.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://www.nevadaart.org/art/exhibitions/gianfranco-gorgoni-land-art-photographs/|Gianfranco Gorgoni: Land Art Photographs, Nevada Museum of Art]] </div> <div>The photograph becomes the primary means through which remote works are encountered, mediating their existence.</div> <div> <p><b>The fundamental event of modernity is the conquest of the world as picture.</b><br>—Martin Heidegger, "The Age of the World Picture"</br></p></div> <div>Modernity transforms the world into something to be represented and ordered, aligning with technological modes of control.</div> <div> [[File:Bruno.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://zkm.de/en/bruno-latour-on-critical-zones|Bruno Latour on Critical Zones]] </div> <div>The Earth is reconceived as a system of interacting zones shaped by technological and ecological processes.</div> <div> [[File:Prospect.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://sites.ualberta.ca/~dmiall/Tintern07/TinternRev/Prospect.htm|Prospect-Refuge Theory]] </div> <div>Perception is structured by spatial conditions that can be manipulated through design and environment.</div> <div> [[File:Line.png|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://ig.ft.com/saudi-neom-line/|Mohammed bin Salman’s utopian city was undone by the laws of physics and finance]] </div> <div>Technological utopias confront the limits imposed by physical reality and resource constraints.</div> <div> [[File:Mukaab.png|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-suspends-work-massive-mukaab-megaproject-sources-say-2026-01-27/|Saudi Arabia shelves Mukaab 'The Cube' project, world's largest skyscraper]] </div> <div>Large-scale projects reveal the tension between ambition and feasibility within technological systems.</div> <div> [[File:Tinguely.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://www.tinguely.ch/en/tinguely-collection-conservation/collection.html?detail=7df0506b-e150-4231-91d5-0694b10c6aa3&utm_source=chatgpt.com|Jean Tinguely, <i>End of the World II</i> preparatory drawing, 1962]] </div> <div>Machines become self-destructive, exposing the instability inherent in technological processes.</div> <div> [[File:Jean.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9 link=https://clui.org/projects/middles-nowheres-dry-lakes-mojave/dry-lakes-mojave/jean-lake?utm_source=chatgpt.com|Jean Lake]] </div> <div>The empty landscape becomes a surface for inscription, where technological intervention defines meaning.</div> <!-- Column 3 response --> </div> </div>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to The MH Project may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
WikiName:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Technology
Add topic